Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt
In a criminal case, the accused is entitled to an acquittal, unless his guilt is shown beyond doubt. Proof beyond reasonable doubt does not mean such a degree of proof as, excluding possibility of error, produces absolute certainty. Moral certainty only is required, or that degree of proof which produces conviction in an unprejudiced mind. On the whole, the meager evidence for the prosecution casts serious doubts as to the guilt of accused. It does not pass the test of moral certainty and is insufficient to rebut the constitutional presumption of innocence. [People v. Bansil, 364 Phil. 22, 34 (1999)]
http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/february2011/188630.htm#_ftn31
Thanks for sharing your blog… I appreciate it. God speed! 😉