Category Archives: SSS

Investigations conducted by SSS do not violate a person’s right to privacy

As a final note, we do not agree with the CA’s pronouncement that the investigations conducted by SSS violate a person’s right to privacy.  SSS, as the primary institution in charge of extending social security protection to workers and their … Continue reading

Posted in SSC, SSS | Tagged | Leave a comment

A spouse who claims entitlement to death benefits as a primary beneficiary under the Social Security Law must establish two qualifying factors, to wit: (1) that he/she is the legitimate spouse; and (2) that he/she is dependent upon the member for support

The law in force at the time of Florante’s death was RA 1161.  Section 8 (e) and (k) of said law provides: Section 8. Terms Defined. For the purposes of this Act, the following terms shall, unless the context indicates … Continue reading

Posted in SSC, SSS | Tagged | Leave a comment

Does the suspension of “all claims” as an incident to a corporate rehabilitation also contemplate the suspension of criminal charges filed against the corporate officers of the distressed corporation?

The issue to be resolved then is: does the suspension of “all claims” as an incident to a corporate rehabilitation also contemplate the suspension of criminal charges filed against the corporate officers of the distressed corporation? This Court rules in … Continue reading

Posted in Action for Claims, Anti Bouncing Check, Corporate Rehabilitation, Insolvency Act, SSS | Tagged | Leave a comment

Are Illegitmate children entitled also to death benefit of their father?

As to the issue of who has the better right over the SSS death benefits, Section 8(e) and (k) of R. A. No. 8282[27] is very clear. Hence, we need only apply the law. Under the principles of statutory construction, … Continue reading

Posted in ECC, Labor Law, Legal Maxim, Pension/Retirement, SSS, Statutory Construction | Leave a comment

Can the SSS deny the petitioner’s application for survivor’s pension on the sole ground that she was not the legal spouse of Bonifacio “as of the date of his retirement;” hence, she could not be considered as his primary beneficiary under Section 12-B(d) of Rep. Act No. 8282?

In the Resolution dated July 19, 2005, the Court required the parties, as well as the Office of the Solicitor General, to file their respective comments on the issue of whether or not the proviso “as of the date of … Continue reading

Posted in Constitutional Law, ECC, Labor Law, Pension/Retirement, SSS | Tagged | 1 Comment