Category Archives: Certiorari Under Rule 65

The acts of a quasi-judicial officer like DOJ Secretary may be assailed by the aggrieved party via a petition for certiorari and enjoined

Posted on March 2, 2012 by Erineus

On March 3, 2000, then Secretary of Justice Artemio Tuquero (Secretary Tuquero) dismissed the PDI Staff’s Petition for Review of the Resolution of the City Prosecutor.[11]  Secretary Tuquero rejected the argument of therein petitioners that the complaint should be dismissed … Continue reading →

Posted in Certiorari, Certiorari Under Rule 65, DOJ, Libel, Probable Cause, Remedial Law | Tagged | Leave a comment

A judgment or final order or resolution of the COA may be brought by the aggrieved party to the Supreme Court on certiorari under Rule 65

Posted on February 23, 2012 by Erineus

To begin with, petitioner availed of the wrong remedy in filing a petition for review under Rule 45. Article IX-A, Section 7 of the Constitution provides that decisions, orders or rulings of the Commission on Audit may be brought to … Continue reading →

Posted in Certiorari, Certiorari Under Rule 65, COA, Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

SC on petitions for certiorari under rule 65 and 45

Posted on February 19, 2012 by Erineus

The instant petition is a direct recourse to this Court from the assailed orders of the RTC. Notably, petitioners did not cite the rule under the Rules of Court by which the petition was filed. If the petition is to … Continue reading →

Posted in Certiorari, Certiorari under Rule 45, Certiorari Under Rule 65 | Tagged | Leave a comment

Court of Appeals has the Power to Review Facts in a Petition For Certiorari under Rule 65

Posted on February 4, 2012 by Erineus

Procedural Issue: Court of Appeals’  Power to Review Facts in a Petition For Certiorari under Rule 65           Culili argued that the Court of Appeals acted in contravention of applicable law and jurisprudence when it reexamined the facts in this … Continue reading →

Posted in Certiorari Under Rule 65, Court of Appeals, Labor Law | Tagged | Leave a comment