Category Archives: Judicial and Legal Ethics

Court employee actually interferes with the execution of a valid certificate of sheriff’s sale in behalf of a friend is unbecoming a Court official

Time and again, we have emphasized that court personnel must devote every moment of official time to public service. The conduct and behavior of court personnel should be characterized by a high degree of professionalism and responsibility, as they mirror … Continue reading

Posted in Judicial and Legal Ethics | Tagged | Leave a comment

Acts of a judge, pertaining to his judicial functions, are not subject to disciplinary action, unless they are tainted with fraud, dishonesty, corruption or bad faith.

However, as to the allegation of grave misconduct in holding a hearing notwithstanding the fact that defendant’s counsel already rested his case, the same has no leg to stand on. It should be emphasized that the questioned ruling of respondent … Continue reading

Posted in Judicial and Legal Ethics | Tagged | Leave a comment

Judge who used degoratory and irreverent language in relation to complainant is guilty of unbecoming a judge

Indeed, the New Code of Judicial Conduct for the Philippine Judiciary exhorts members of the judiciary, in the discharge of their duties, to be models of propriety at all times. Judge Amila should be reminded of Sections 1 and 6, … Continue reading

Posted in Judicial and Legal Ethics | Leave a comment

Disciplinary proceedings against lawyers initiated motu proprio by the Supreme Court under Rule 139-B, Section 13 do not involve a trial

Respondents’ requests for a hearing, for production/presentation of evidence bearing on the plagiarism and misrepresentation issues in G.R. No. 162230 and A.M. No. 10-7-17-SC, and for access to the records of A.M. No. 10-7-17-SC are unmeritorious. In the Common Compliance, … Continue reading

Posted in Disciplinary Proceedings, Judicial and Legal Ethics, Supreme Court | Tagged | Leave a comment

Whether lawyers who are also law professors can invoke academic freedom as a defense in an administrative proceeding for intemperate statements tending to pressure the Court or influence the outcome of a case or degrade the courts.

The Show Cause Resolution does not interfere with respondents’ academic freedom.               It is not contested that respondents herein are, by law and jurisprudence, guaranteed academic freedom and undisputably, they are free to determine what they will teach … Continue reading

Posted in Academic Freedom, Judicial and Legal Ethics, Supreme Court | Tagged | Leave a comment