The requisite (1) good faith on the part of the third person and (2) fraud, necessary for an action to rescind under Art. 1381 of the Civil Code, were not complied with
In Siguan v. Lim, this Court held that in an action to rescind under Art. 1381, the following requisites must exist:
The action to rescind contracts in fraud of creditors is known as accion pauliana. For this action to prosper, the following requisites must be present: (1) the plaintiff asking for rescission has a credit prior to the alienation, although demandable later; (2) the debtor has made a subsequent contract conveying a patrimonial benefit to a third person; (3) the creditor has no other legal remedy to satisfy his claim; (4) the act being impugned is fraudulent; (5) the third person who received the property conveyed, if it is by onerous title, has been an accomplice in the fraud. (Emphasis Ours; citations omitted.)
Considering the discussions previously expounded, the extant records show that the fourth and fifth requisites enumerated above are absent.